Wikipedia:No queerphobia

[XFB] Konu Bilgileri

Konu Hakkında Merhaba, tarihinde Wiki kategorisinde News tarafından oluşturulan Wikipedia:No queerphobia başlıklı konuyu okuyorsunuz. Bu konu şimdiye dek 3 kez görüntülenmiş, 0 yorum ve 0 tepki puanı almıştır...
Kategori Adı Wiki
Konu Başlığı Wikipedia:No queerphobia
Konbuyu başlatan News
Başlangıç tarihi
Cevaplar
Görüntüleme
İlk mesaj tepki puanı
Son Mesaj Yazan News

News

Moderator
Top Poster Of Month
Credits
0
Queerphobic beliefs: adding in "disfavored" just to avoid casting too much POV unneededly (some folks would argue, say, that polygamy is not "strange", but that's definitely on the slippery slope warning list.)

← Previous revision
Revision as of 19:54, 5 May 2024
Line 45:Line 45:
* That LGBT people overall have greater societal power than [[cisgender]]/[[heterosexual]] people.* That LGBT people overall have greater societal power than [[cisgender]]/[[heterosexual]] people.
* That [[same-sex marriage|marriage]], [[same-sex adoption]], or [[LGBT parenting|parenting]] should be restricted to heterosexual couples.* That [[same-sex marriage|marriage]], [[same-sex adoption]], or [[LGBT parenting|parenting]] should be restricted to heterosexual couples.
* That recognizing same-sex marriage is a slippery slope towards legalizing [[bestiality]] or other strange sexual practices.* That recognizing same-sex marriage is a slippery slope towards legalizing [[bestiality]] or other strange or disfavored sexual practices.
Overlapping with the narratives and beliefs above are more medically-related pseudoscientific/unevidenced proposals and typologies. The guideline [[WP:FRINGE]] addresses how to handle these in articles (we don't include them in articles on the broader topic, but if notable we can discuss them in their own articles while making clear they're fringe).Overlapping with the narratives and beliefs above are more medically-related pseudoscientific/unevidenced proposals and typologies. The guideline [[WP:FRINGE]] addresses how to handle these in articles (we don't include them in articles on the broader topic, but if notable we can discuss them in their own articles while making clear they're fringe).

Okumaya devam et...
 

Geri
Üst