Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Pakistani sources: Reply
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 18:03, 2 May 2024 |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| :::You're mixing 2 arguments. Argument 1: That the page was created by a user who was later blocked. Unless the page's creation is the very reason why he was blocked (not the case here), that's not a valid reason for deletion. Second, that unlike the perennial sources pages this one has not been subject to substantial scrutiny. That can easily be dealt with with a disclaimer at the top. I know nothing of Pakistani press or politics, so I don't know if the list is accurate or not, but I can't support deletion based on my own ignorance. If someone with more local knowledge can actually point examples of misuse, then that would be something else. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 23:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) | :::You're mixing 2 arguments. Argument 1: That the page was created by a user who was later blocked. Unless the page's creation is the very reason why he was blocked (not the case here), that's not a valid reason for deletion. Second, that unlike the perennial sources pages this one has not been subject to substantial scrutiny. That can easily be dealt with with a disclaimer at the top. I know nothing of Pakistani press or politics, so I don't know if the list is accurate or not, but I can't support deletion based on my own ignorance. If someone with more local knowledge can actually point examples of misuse, then that would be something else. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 23:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
| ::::If you look at [[WP:NEWSORGINDIA]], that summarizes media in all of the Indian subcontinent, including Pakistan. Much of it is paid for and this page looks like it was clearly created to prop up otherwise non-reliable sources and paid media. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 17:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | ::::If you look at [[WP:NEWSORGINDIA]], that summarizes media in all of the Indian subcontinent, including Pakistan. Much of it is paid for and this page looks like it was clearly created to prop up otherwise non-reliable sources and paid media. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 17:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
| ::::If you acknowledge your lack of familiarity with Pakistani press and sources , then on what basis did you vote to keep this page? This page is already being exploited by serial sockpuppets who utilizing unreliable sources listed on this page to cite material on BLPs. —[[User:Saqib|<span style="color:#005080">Saqib</span>]] ([[User talk:Saqib|<span style="color:#700090">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Saqib|<span style="color:#996600">contribs</span>]]) 18:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |
| *'''Delete''' - It falls under [[WP:TNT]] territory at this point. Two editors do not decide the reliability of sources and the fact that one was here gaming the system is kind of sad actually. The fact that the "generally borderline sources" (eluding that they can still be used) are in fact, UNRELIABLE sources, which are not included in the unreliable source section (Odd there are only three sources deemed "unreliable"). --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 17:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - It falls under [[WP:TNT]] territory at this point. Two editors do not decide the reliability of sources and the fact that one was here gaming the system is kind of sad actually. The fact that the "generally borderline sources" (eluding that they can still be used) are in fact, UNRELIABLE sources, which are not included in the unreliable source section (Odd there are only three sources deemed "unreliable"). --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 17:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
Okumaya devam et...