Victor Corkran: sock
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 12:16, 29 April 2024 |
| Line 22: | Line 22: |
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia eletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-familyapyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Victor Corkran]]</noinclude></p> | :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipediaeletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-familyapyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Victor Corkran]]</noinclude></p> |
| * '''Keep''': definitely notable, has one source which makes it KEEP. I’m participating here because non living person’s article is being created here with an image royal family, with source I can’t find any reason why it should be deleted. [[User:AnkkAnkur|AnkkAnkur]] ([[User talk:AnkkAnkur|talk]]) 11:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) <small>— [[User:AnkkAnkur|AnkkAnkur]] ([[User talk:AnkkAnkur|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AnkkAnkur|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> | * <s>Keep: definitely notable, has one source which makes it KEEP. I’m participating here because non living person’s article is being created here with an image royal family, with source I can’t find any reason why it should be deleted. [[User:AnkkAnkur|AnkkAnkur]] ([[User talk:AnkkAnkur|talk]]) 11:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) <s><small>— [[User:AnkkAnkur|AnkkAnkur]] ([[User talk:AnkkAnkur|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AnkkAnkur|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small><small>Plus they're a sock. 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC) </small> |
| *'''Delete''' [[WP:ANYBIO]] does not override GNG: "conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." The sourcing demonstrates trivial mentions, not significant coverage. Take [https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-mirror-mornings-gossip/145110327/ this] "Morning's Gossip" from the ''Daily Mirror'' for example. The entirety of the relevant part of this source is one sentence "Mr Victor Cochrane has arrived at Osborne Cottage in attendance on the Princess" this is plainly not the sourcing required to demonstrate notability. Simply being a servant to a British royal does not mean you [[WP:INHERIT| inherit]] notability. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 11:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' [[WP:ANYBIO]] does not override GNG: "conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." The sourcing demonstrates trivial mentions, not significant coverage. Take [https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-mirror-mornings-gossip/145110327/ this] "Morning's Gossip" from the ''Daily Mirror'' for example. The entirety of the relevant part of this source is one sentence "Mr Victor Cochrane has arrived at Osborne Cottage in attendance on the Princess" this is plainly not the sourcing required to demonstrate notability. Simply being a servant to a British royal does not mean you [[WP:INHERIT| inherit]] notability. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 11:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
| **Once again, [[WP:INHERITED]] does not apply (and note it's only an essay in any case). He is not notable for anything inherited from anyone else but for the achievements that gave him a CVO and then a KCVO, which are only awarded to people who are already notable. I do wish people would stop citing the wrong thing. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 13:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | **Once again, [[WP:INHERITED]] does not apply (and note it's only an essay in any case). He is not notable for anything inherited from anyone else but for the achievements that gave him a CVO and then a KCVO, which are only awarded to people who are already notable. I do wish people would stop citing the wrong thing. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 13:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
Okumaya devam et...