Classification
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 13:06, 27 April 2024 |
| Line 24: | Line 24: |
| ==Classification== | ==Classification== |
| A close relation between Meto and the languages of Rote was proposed in the 20th century by Jonker (1913) and Mills (1991).<ref name=Jonker1913>{{cite journal |last=Jonker |first=J. C. G. |year=1913 |title=Bijdrage tot de kennis der Rottineesche tongvallen |journal=Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië |volume=68 |pages=521–622 |jstor=20769734}}.</ref><ref name=Mills1991>{{cite book |last=Mills |first=Roger F. |year=1991 |chapter=Tanimbar-Kei: An Eastern Indonesian Subgroup |editor=Robert Blust |title=Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian Languages and ethnolinguistics in Honour of George W. Grace |pages=241–263 |series=Pacific Linguistics, C-117 |location=Canberra |publisher=Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University |doi=10.15144/PL-C117.241}}</ref> Edwards (2018a, 2018b, 2021) studied the phonological history of the Rote–Meto languages and reconstructed the ancestral proto-language, ''Proto-Rote–Meto'', based on internal evidence from the Rote–Meto languages, and also from the top-down by tracing the phonological changes that occurred in known reconstructions of [[Proto-Malayo-Polynesian]] words.<ref name=Edwards2021/><ref name=Edwards2018a>{{cite journal |last=Edwards |first=Owen |year=2018a |title=Parallel Histories in Rote-Meto |journal=Oceanic Linguistics |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=359–409 |doi=10.1353/ol.2018.0016 |hdl=1887/67592 |hdl-access=free}}.</ref><ref name=Edwards2018b>{{cite journal |last=Edwards |first=Owen |year=2018b |title=Top-Down Historical Phonology of Rote-Meto |journal=Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=63–90 |hdl=10524/52421 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> | A close relation between Meto and the languages of Rote was proposed in the 20th century by Jonker (1913) and Mills (1991).<ref name=Jonker1913>{{cite journal |last=Jonker |first=J. C. G. |year=1913 |title=Bijdrage tot de kennis der Rottineesche tongvallen |journal=Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië |volume=68 |pages=521–622 |jstor=20769734}}.</ref><ref name=Mills1991>{{cite book |last=Mills |first=Roger F. |year=1991 |chapter=Tanimbar-Kei: An Eastern Indonesian Subgroup |editor=Robert Blust |title=Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian Languages and ethnolinguistics in Honour of George W. Grace |pages=241–263 |series=Pacific Linguistics, C-117 |location=Canberra |publisher=Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University |doi=10.15144/PL-C117.241}}</ref> Edwards (2018a, 2018b, 2021) studied the phonological history of the Rote–Meto languages and reconstructed the ancestral proto-language, ''Proto-Rote–Meto'', based on internal evidence from the Rote–Meto languages, and also from the top-down by tracing the phonological changes that occurred in Rote–Meto reflexes of [[Proto-Austronesian]] and [[Proto-Malayo-Polynesian]] reconstructions.<ref name=Edwards2021/><ref name=Edwards2018a>{{cite journal |last=Edwards |first=Owen |year=2018a |title=Parallel Histories in Rote-Meto |journal=Oceanic Linguistics |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=359–409 |doi=10.1353/ol.2018.0016 |hdl=1887/67592 |hdl-access=free}}.</ref><ref name=Edwards2018b>{{cite journal |last=Edwards |first=Owen |year=2018b |title=Top-Down Historical Phonology of Rote-Meto |journal=Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=63–90 |hdl=10524/52421 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> |
| Inspite of being located at the opposite geopraphical ends of the Rote–Meto speech area, Meto and West Rote share many common features in their lexicon and historical phonology.<ref name=Jonker1913/><ref name=Edwards2018a/> This suggests that Proto-Rote–Meto first split into two branches, West Rote-Meto and Nuclear Rote. | Inspite of being located at the opposite geopraphical ends of the Rote–Meto speech area, Meto and West Rote share many common features in their lexicon and historical phonology.<ref name=Jonker1913/><ref name=Edwards2018a/> This suggests that Proto-Rote–Meto first split into two branches, West Rote-Meto and Nuclear Rote. |
Okumaya devam et...