Requested move 22 March 2024: used the wrong indent level
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 14:56, 8 May 2024 |
| Line 67: | Line 67: |
| ::[[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 03:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | ::[[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 03:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC) |
| ::Throwing my opinion out there: I don't mind either of the first three titles in the list above. I would prefer the first or second equally, "case" seems redundant but not so much so that I would oppose a move there. I agree with robertsky that "Vincent Lee kidnapping case" makes it seem as if Vincent Lee was kidnapped, which is not the case, so I would oppose a move there. I still support a move overall; the perpetrator here fails both points outlined in [[WP:CRIMINAL]] and so should not be the subject of an article. | ::Throwing my opinion out there: I don't mind either of the first three titles in the list above. I would prefer the first or second equally, "case" seems redundant but not so much so that I would oppose a move there. I agree with robertsky that "Vincent Lee kidnapping case" makes it seem as if Vincent Lee was kidnapped, which is not the case, so I would oppose a move there. I still support a move overall; the perpetrator here fails both points outlined in [[WP:CRIMINAL]] and so should not be the subject of an article. |
::[[User ARAKANYAA|PARAKANYAA]], your concern was about lacking enough information for an event-based article: now that detail on the crime itself has been restored, and it's been clarified by a member of the OS team that its inclusion is fine, do you still object to the move? [[User:Tollens|Tollens]] ([[User talk:Tollens|talk]]) 20:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC) | :[[UserARAKANYAA|PARAKANYAA]], your concern was about lacking enough information for an event-based article: now that detail on the crime itself has been restored, and it's been clarified by a member of the OS team that its inclusion is fine, do you still object to the move? [[User:Tollens|Tollens]] ([[User talk:Tollens|talk]]) 20:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
| :I might as well have an opinion given that this isn't going places very fast - I agree with Tollens about the first two being the top choices. The first is more specific (which would help if there were more than one kidnapping that year) while the second is a location that everyone will know (i.e. it will be a more obvious search term). I therefore lean very slightly towards the second option, though I think whichever is chosen there should be a redirect from the other one for completeness. [[Userrimefac|Primefac]] ([[User talkrimefac|talk]]) 06:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) | :I might as well have an opinion given that this isn't going places very fast - I agree with Tollens about the first two being the top choices. The first is more specific (which would help if there were more than one kidnapping that year) while the second is a location that everyone will know (i.e. it will be a more obvious search term). I therefore lean very slightly towards the second option, though I think whichever is chosen there should be a redirect from the other one for completeness. [[Userrimefac|Primefac]] ([[User talkrimefac|talk]]) 06:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
Okumaya devam et...