Get an admin to review the citations
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 05:03, 4 May 2024 |
| Line 129: | Line 129: |
| :::FDA regulations is not the same as being a scheduled drug on the CSA. Possesion of CBD with less than 0.3% D9-THC is legal as an uncontrolled substance according to the CSAs broad hemp definition execution and the DEA itself and you dont need a license to obtain or handle it. | :::FDA regulations is not the same as being a scheduled drug on the CSA. Possesion of CBD with less than 0.3% D9-THC is legal as an uncontrolled substance according to the CSAs broad hemp definition execution and the DEA itself and you dont need a license to obtain or handle it. |
| :::Cannabis over 0.3% D9-THC is a schedule I drug. Cannabis under 0.3% THC is not a schedule I drug, it's an uncontrolled substance and specifically excluded on the CSA (which the DEA confirms). If CBD comes from Cannabis under 0.3% THC it's not a scheduled drug. Possession of CBD that meets thst criteria is a legal, unscheduled substance that you will not be arrested for the possession of. There's several cases where police have given back Cannabis products after lab testing because it's legal if it's under 0.3% D9-THC [[User:Gettinglit|Gettinglit]] ([[User talk:Gettinglit|talk]]) 05:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | :::Cannabis over 0.3% D9-THC is a schedule I drug. Cannabis under 0.3% THC is not a schedule I drug, it's an uncontrolled substance and specifically excluded on the CSA (which the DEA confirms). If CBD comes from Cannabis under 0.3% THC it's not a scheduled drug. Possession of CBD that meets thst criteria is a legal, unscheduled substance that you will not be arrested for the possession of. There's several cases where police have given back Cannabis products after lab testing because it's legal if it's under 0.3% D9-THC [[User:Gettinglit|Gettinglit]] ([[User talk:Gettinglit|talk]]) 05:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC) |
| ::::You are treating hemp-derived CBD as if it is the national standard, but hemp CBD is a minor source <u>only</u> for research, and is highly restricted by the FDA. It is [[WP:UNDUE]] in terms of the national policy for mention in the infobox. The article's [[Cannabidiol#United_States|section on the United States]] has the content: | |
| :::::''"The FDA retains regulatory authority over hemp-derived CBD, while the DEA is not involved in the regulation of legally-compliant hemp and hemp products. The 2018 Farm Bill requires that research and development of CBD for a therapeutic purpose would have to be conducted under notification and reporting to the FDA."'' | |
| ::::There are no hemp-CBD products on the US market, and interstate commerce is disallowed. The FDA position is the existing restrictive rule on CBD, as explained and sourced above and in the article. Please stop warring over the infobox legal status which is supported by the Federal Register and FDA sources. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 15:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC) |
Okumaya devam et...