r
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 13:06, 8 May 2024 |
| Line 453: | Line 453: |
| :The article says "{{tq|Stockport Council it would review suggestions that she had committed tax or electoral fraud.}}" (presumably the word "said", or similar, is missing). But I can see no support, in either of the two existing sources, for that claim. Thanks. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 12:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC) | :The article says "{{tq|Stockport Council it would review suggestions that she had committed tax or electoral fraud.}}" (presumably the word "said", or similar, is missing). But I can see no support, in either of the two existing sources, for that claim. Thanks. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 12:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
| ::We should fix, where possible. I don't have a Times subscription, but the google cache of their articles on the subject includes the line "Stockport council is also reviewing suggestions that Rayner committed electoral or tax fraud." Other news sources state that Stockport what Stockport council are reviewing is something quite different. The FT makes no mention of Stockport council in any of three articles on the topic. From that perspective, it looks like undue weight to a single source, despite its reputation. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#4682B4 0.1em 0.1em 1.5em,#4682B4 -0.1em -0.1em 1.5em;color:#000000">[[User:Cambial Yellowing|<i style="color:#999900">Cambial </i>]]— [[User talk:Cambial Yellowing|<b style="color:#218000">foliar❧</b>]]</span> 13:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
Okumaya devam et...