Streisand effect

[XFB] Konu Bilgileri

Konu Hakkında Merhaba, tarihinde Wiki kategorisinde News tarafından oluşturulan Streisand effect başlıklı konuyu okuyorsunuz. Bu konu şimdiye dek 1 kez görüntülenmiş, 0 yorum ve 0 tepki puanı almıştır...
Kategori Adı Wiki
Konu Başlığı Streisand effect
Thread starter News
Start date
Replies
Views
First message reaction score
Son Mesaj Yazan News

News

Moderator
Top Poster Of Month
Credits
0
Undid revision 1222140505 by Harold the Sheep (talk) Nah, it was illogical amd you didn’t say what was better

← Previous revision
Revision as of 05:03, 4 May 2024
Line 4:Line 4:
[[File:Streisand Estate.jpg|300px|thumb|The original image of Barbra Streisand's cliff-top residence in [[Malibu, California]], which she attempted to suppress in 2003]][[File:Streisand Estate.jpg|300px|thumb|The original image of Barbra Streisand's cliff-top residence in [[Malibu, California]], which she attempted to suppress in 2003]]
The '''Streisand effect''' is an [[unintended consequences|unintended consequence]] of attempts to hide, remove, or censor information, where the effort instead increases public awareness of the information. The effect is named for American singer and actress [[Barbra Streisand]], whose attorney's attempt in 2003 to suppress the publication of a photograph showing her clifftop residence in [[Malibu, California|Malibu]], taken to document [[coastal erosion]] in California, inadvertently drew far greater attention to the previously obscure photograph.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Streisand Effect |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/words-were-watching-streisand-effect-barbra |website=Merriam-Webster.com |publisher=Merriam Webster dictionary |access-date=March 25, 2019}}</ref> The effect exemplifies [[Reactance (psychology)|psychological reactance]]: where the desire to hide information instead makes its propagation more likely.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Burnett |first1=Dean |date=May 22, 2015 |title=Why government censorship [in no way at all] carries greater risks than benefits |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science.../government-censorship-psychology-theresa-may |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/2016042.../government-censorship-psychology-theresa-may |archive-date=April 24, 2016 |access-date=April 16, 2016 |work=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref>.<ref name="London2">{{Cite journal |last=Canton |first=David |date=November 5, 2005 |title=Today's Business Law: Attempt to suppress can backfire |url=http://www.lfpress.ca/cgi-bin/publish.cgi?p=111404&x=articles&s=shopping |url-status=dead |journal=[[The London Free Press]] |archive-url=https://archive.today/2007092701424...in/publish.cgi?p=111404&x=articles&s=shopping |archive-date=September 27, 2007 |access-date=July 21, 2007 |quote=The 'Streisand effect' is what happens when someone tries to suppress something and the opposite occurs. The act of suppressing it raises the profile, making it much more well known than it ever would have been.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Mugrabi |first=Sunshine |date=January 22, 2007 |title=YouTube – Censored? Offending Paula Abdul clips are abruptly taken down. |url=http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=20872&hed=YouTube—Censored? |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/2007021820085...om/Article.aspx?a=20872&hed=YouTube—Censored? |archive-date=February 18, 2007 |access-date=July 21, 2007 |work=[[Red Herring (magazine)|Red Herring]] |quote=Another [[unintended consequences|unintended consequence]] of this move could be that it extends the kerfuffle over Ms. Abdul's behavior rather than quelling it. Mr. Nguyen called this the 'Barbra Streisand effect', referring to that actress's insistence that paparazzi photos of her mansion not be used}}</ref>The '''Streisand effect''' is a popular phenomenon of [[unintended consequences]] in which attempts to remove information, often found online, can instead draw greater attention. The effect is named for American singer and actress [[Barbra Streisand]], whose attorney's attempt in 2003 to suppress the publication of a photograph showing her clifftop residence in [[Malibu, California|Malibu]], taken to document [[coastal erosion]] in California, inadvertently drew far greater attention to the previously obscure photograph.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Streisand Effect |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/words-were-watching-streisand-effect-barbra |website=Merriam-Webster.com |publisher=Merriam Webster dictionary |access-date=March 25, 2019}}</ref> The effect exemplifies [[Reactance (psychology)|psychological reactance]]: where the desire to hide information instead makes its propagation more likely.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Burnett |first1=Dean |date=May 22, 2015 |title=Why government censorship [in no way at all] carries greater risks than benefits |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science.../government-censorship-psychology-theresa-may |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/2016042.../government-censorship-psychology-theresa-may |archive-date=April 24, 2016 |access-date=April 16, 2016 |work=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref>.<ref name="London2">{{Cite journal |last=Canton |first=David |date=November 5, 2005 |title=Today's Business Law: Attempt to suppress can backfire |url=http://www.lfpress.ca/cgi-bin/publish.cgi?p=111404&x=articles&s=shopping |url-status=dead |journal=[[The London Free Press]] |archive-url=https://archive.today/2007092701424...in/publish.cgi?p=111404&x=articles&s=shopping |archive-date=September 27, 2007 |access-date=July 21, 2007 |quote=The 'Streisand effect' is what happens when someone tries to suppress something and the opposite occurs. The act of suppressing it raises the profile, making it much more well known than it ever would have been.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Mugrabi |first=Sunshine |date=January 22, 2007 |title=YouTube – Censored? Offending Paula Abdul clips are abruptly taken down. |url=http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=20872&hed=YouTube—Censored? |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/2007021820085...om/Article.aspx?a=20872&hed=YouTube—Censored? |archive-date=February 18, 2007 |access-date=July 21, 2007 |work=[[Red Herring (magazine)|Red Herring]] |quote=Another [[unintended consequences|unintended consequence]] of this move could be that it extends the kerfuffle over Ms. Abdul's behavior rather than quelling it. Mr. Nguyen called this the 'Barbra Streisand effect', referring to that actress's insistence that paparazzi photos of her mansion not be used}}</ref>
== Mechanism ==== Mechanism ==

Okumaya devam et...
 

Back
Top