what the source actually says, plus brings in relevant wikilink
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 02:35, 29 April 2024 |
| Line 26: | Line 26: |
| Gabriel Sivan ,the chairman of the [[Jewish Bible Association]] wrote that the lawsuit is "absurd", but if taken seriously, it would expose Hilmi and his backers to a massive countersuit that would involve compensation for slave labor of 600,000 Israelites working seven days a week for 430 years. <ref>{{cite journal|url=https://jbqnew.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/321/321_sivanedit.pdf |journal=Jewish Bible Quarterly|volume=XXXII:1|issue=January – March 2004|first=Gabriel|last=Sivan|title=Editorial}}</ref> | Gabriel Sivan ,the chairman of the [[Jewish Bible Association]] wrote that the lawsuit is "absurd", but if taken seriously, it would expose Hilmi and his backers to a massive countersuit that would involve compensation for slave labor of 600,000 Israelites working seven days a week for 430 years. <ref>{{cite journal|url=https://jbqnew.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/321/321_sivanedit.pdf |journal=Jewish Bible Quarterly|volume=XXXII:1|issue=January – March 2004|first=Gabriel|last=Sivan|title=Editorial}}</ref> |
| Calling the suit "ridiculous, laughable and absolute rubbish", [[Beliefnet]] columnist Hesham Hassaballa pointed out that according to the biblical narrative, the Israelites were operating under the direct instructions from God, so the lawsuit would make God an unindicted co-conspirator.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://forward.com/opinion/8119/a-muslim-defense-of-jews-on-trial/|title=A Muslim Defense Of Jews on Trial|first=Hesham|last=Hassaballa|publisher=[[The Forward]]|date=September 12, 2003}}</ref> | Calling the suit "ridiculous, laughable and absolute rubbish", [[Beliefnet]] columnist Hesham Hassaballa pointed out that according to the [[Book of Exodus]], the Israelites were operating under the direct instructions from God, so the lawsuit would make God an unindicted co-conspirator.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://forward.com/opinion/8119/a-muslim-defense-of-jews-on-trial/|title=A Muslim Defense Of Jews on Trial|first=Hesham|last=Hassaballa|publisher=[[The Forward]]|date=September 12, 2003}}</ref> |
| In a [[tongue-in-cheek]] commentary on the planned lawsuit, [[The Irish Independent]] notes that "Tracing the evidence at this distance in time may be problematic. The Exodus happened several thousand years ago, and just to complicate matters, the number of potential suspects, totals about 600,000."<ref>{{cite news|publisher=[[The Irish Independent]]|url=https://www.independent.ie/world-ne...exodus-treasure/25930727.html|title=Egyptians may sue Jews over Exodus treasure|first=David|last=Randall|date=September 14, 2003}}</ref> | In a [[tongue-in-cheek]] commentary on the planned lawsuit, [[The Irish Independent]] notes that "Tracing the evidence at this distance in time may be problematic. The Exodus happened several thousand years ago, and just to complicate matters, the number of potential suspects, totals about 600,000."<ref>{{cite news|publisher=[[The Irish Independent]]|url=https://www.independent.ie/world-ne...exodus-treasure/25930727.html|title=Egyptians may sue Jews over Exodus treasure|first=David|last=Randall|date=September 14, 2003}}</ref> |
Okumaya devam et...