refs
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 01:13, 10 May 2024 |
| Line 323: | Line 323: |
| Scholars state that Anthroposophy is influenced by [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Gnosticism]].<ref>Sources for 'Christian Gnosticism':{{Bulleted list|{{harvnb|Robertson|2021|p=57}}|{{harvnb|Gilmer|2021|p=41}}|{{harvnb|Quispel|1980}}|{{harvnb|Quispel|van Oort|2008|p=1}}|{{harvnb|Carlson|2018|p=58}}|{{harvnb|McL. Wilson|1993|p=256}}}}</ref> The Catholic Church did in 1919 issue an edict classifying Anthroposophy as "a neognostic heresy" despite the fact that Steiner "very well respected the distinctions on which Catholic dogma insists".<ref name="Diener Hipolito 2013 p. 77">{{cite book | last1=Diener | first1=Astrid | last2=Hipolito | first2=Jane | title=The Role of Imagination in Culture and Society: Owen Barfield's Early Work | publisher=Wipf and Stock Publishers | year=2013 | origyear=2002 | isbn=978-1-7252-3320-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2kf7DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 | access-date=6 March 2023 | page=77}}</ref> | Scholars state that Anthroposophy is influenced by [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Gnosticism]].<ref>Sources for 'Christian Gnosticism':{{Bulleted list|{{harvnb|Robertson|2021|p=57}}|{{harvnb|Gilmer|2021|p=41}}|{{harvnb|Quispel|1980}}|{{harvnb|Quispel|van Oort|2008|p=1}}|{{harvnb|Carlson|2018|p=58}}|{{harvnb|McL. Wilson|1993|p=256}}}}</ref> The Catholic Church did in 1919 issue an edict classifying Anthroposophy as "a neognostic heresy" despite the fact that Steiner "very well respected the distinctions on which Catholic dogma insists".<ref name="Diener Hipolito 2013 p. 77">{{cite book | last1=Diener | first1=Astrid | last2=Hipolito | first2=Jane | title=The Role of Imagination in Culture and Society: Owen Barfield's Early Work | publisher=Wipf and Stock Publishers | year=2013 | origyear=2002 | isbn=978-1-7252-3320-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2kf7DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 | access-date=6 March 2023 | page=77}}</ref> |
| Some Baptist and mainstream academical heresiologists still appear inclined to agree with the more narrow prior edict of 1919<ref name="Ellwood Partin 2016 p.">{{cite book | last1=Ellwood | first1=Robert | last2=Partin | first2=Harry | title=Religious and Spiritual Groups in Modern America | publisher=Taylor & Francis | year=2016 | isbn=978-1-315-50723-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oWN4DQAAQBAJ | edition=2nd | origyear=1988, 1973 | access-date=6 March 2023 | page=unpaginated | quote=On the one hand, there are what might be called the Western groups, which reject the alleged extravagance and orientalism of evolved Theosophy, in favor of a serious emphasis on its metaphysics and especially its recovery of the Gnostic and Hermetic heritage. These groups feel that the love of India and its mysteries which grew up after Isis Unveiled was unfortunate for a Western group. In this category there are several Neo-Gnostic and Neo-Rosicrucian groups. The Anthroposophy of Rudolf Steiner is also in this category. On the other hand, there are what may be termed "new revelation" Theosophical schisms, generally based on new revelations from the Masters not accepted by the main traditions. In this set would be Alice Bailey's groups, "I "*****"," and in a sense Max Heindel's Rosicrucianism.}}</ref> on dogma and the Lutheran (Missouri Sinod) apologist and heresiologist Eldon K. Winker quoted Ron Rhodes that Steiner's Christology is very similar to [[Cerinthus]].<ref name="Winker 1994 p. ">Sources for 'Christology':{{Bulleted list|{{cite book | last=Winker | first=Eldon K. | title=The New Age is Lying to You | publisher=Concordia Publishing House | series=Concordia scholarship today | year=1994 | isbn=978-0-570-04637-0 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W90QAQAAIAAJ | access-date=6 March 2023 | page=34 | quote=The Christology of Cerinthus is notably similar to that of Rudolf Steiner (who founded the Anthroposophical Society in 1912) and contemporary New Age writers such as David Spangler and George Trevelyan. These individuals all say the Christ descended on the human Jesus at his baptism. But they differ with Cerinthus in that they do not believe the Christ departed from Jesus prior to the crucfixion.{{sup|12}}}}|{{cite book | last=Rhodes | first=Ron | title=The Counterfeit Christ of the New Age Movement | publisher=Baker Book House | series=Christian Research Institute Series | year=1990 | isbn=978-0-8010-7757-9 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QwtBPQAACAAJ | access-date=26 October 2023 | page=19}}</ref> Steiner did perceive "a distinction between the human person Jesus, and Christ as the divine Logos",<ref name="Cees Christ">{{cite book |author-first1=Cees |author-last1=Leijenhorst |author-link1=Cees Leijenhorst |editor-link1=Wouter Hanegraaff | editor-last1=Hanegraaff | editor-first1=Wouter J. | editor-last2=Faivre | editor-first2=Antoine | editor-last3=van den Broek | editor-first3=Roelof | editor-last4=Brach | editor-first4=Jean-Pierre | year=2006 |title=Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism |chapter=Antroposophy |place=Leiden / Boston |publisher=Brill |page=84 |quote=Nevertheless, he made a distinction between the human person Jesus, and Christ as the divine Logos.}}}}</ref> which could be construed as Gnostic but not [[docetism|Docetic]],<ref name="Cees Christ"/> since "they do not believe the Christ departed from Jesus prior to the crucfixion".<ref name="Winker 1994 p."/> "Steiner's Christology is discussed as a central element of his thought in Johannes Hemleben, ''Rudolf Steiner: A Documentary Biography,'' trans. Leo Twyman (East Grinstead, Sussex: Henry Goulden, 1975), pp. 96-100. From the perspective of orthodox Christianity, it may be said that Steiner combined a docetic understanding of Christ's nature with the Adoptionist heresy."<ref name="g483">{{cite book | last=Etter | first=Brian K. | title=From Classicism to Modernism | publisher=Routledge | year=2019 | orig-year=2001 | isbn=978-1-315-18576-7 | chapter=Chapter Six The New Music and the Influence of Theosophy | page=unpaginated. fn. 80.}}</ref> | Some Baptist and mainstream academical heresiologists still appear inclined to agree with the more narrow prior edict of 1919<ref name="Ellwood Partin 2016 p.">{{cite book | last1=Ellwood | first1=Robert | last2=Partin | first2=Harry | title=Religious and Spiritual Groups in Modern America | publisher=Taylor & Francis | year=2016 | isbn=978-1-315-50723-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oWN4DQAAQBAJ | edition=2nd | origyear=1988, 1973 | access-date=6 March 2023 | page=unpaginated | quote=On the one hand, there are what might be called the Western groups, which reject the alleged extravagance and orientalism of evolved Theosophy, in favor of a serious emphasis on its metaphysics and especially its recovery of the Gnostic and Hermetic heritage. These groups feel that the love of India and its mysteries which grew up after Isis Unveiled was unfortunate for a Western group. In this category there are several Neo-Gnostic and Neo-Rosicrucian groups. The Anthroposophy of Rudolf Steiner is also in this category. On the other hand, there are what may be termed "new revelation" Theosophical schisms, generally based on new revelations from the Masters not accepted by the main traditions. In this set would be Alice Bailey's groups, "I "*****"," and in a sense Max Heindel's Rosicrucianism.}}</ref> on dogma and the Lutheran (Missouri Sinod) apologist and heresiologist Eldon K. Winker quoted Ron Rhodes that Steiner's Christology is very similar to [[Cerinthus]].<ref name="Winker 1994 p. ">Sources for 'Christology':{{Bulleted list|{{cite book | last=Winker | first=Eldon K. | title=The New Age is Lying to You | publisher=Concordia Publishing House | series=Concordia scholarship today | year=1994 | isbn=978-0-570-04637-0 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W90QAQAAIAAJ | access-date=6 March 2023 | page=34 | quote=The Christology of Cerinthus is notably similar to that of Rudolf Steiner (who founded the Anthroposophical Society in 1912) and contemporary New Age writers such as David Spangler and George Trevelyan. These individuals all say the Christ descended on the human Jesus at his baptism. But they differ with Cerinthus in that they do not believe the Christ departed from Jesus prior to the crucfixion.{{sup|12}}}}|{{cite book | last=Rhodes | first=Ron | title=The Counterfeit Christ of the New Age Movement | publisher=Baker Book House | series=Christian Research Institute Series | year=1990 | isbn=978-0-8010-7757-9 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QwtBPQAACAAJ | access-date=26 October 2023 | page=19}}}}</ref> Steiner did perceive "a distinction between the human person Jesus, and Christ as the divine Logos",<ref name="Cees Christ">{{cite book |author-first1=Cees |author-last1=Leijenhorst |author-link1=Cees Leijenhorst |editor-link1=Wouter Hanegraaff | editor-last1=Hanegraaff | editor-first1=Wouter J. | editor-last2=Faivre | editor-first2=Antoine | editor-last3=van den Broek | editor-first3=Roelof | editor-last4=Brach | editor-first4=Jean-Pierre | year=2006 |title=Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism |chapter=Antroposophy |place=Leiden / Boston |publisher=Brill |page=84 |quote=Nevertheless, he made a distinction between the human person Jesus, and Christ as the divine Logos.}}}}</ref> which could be construed as Gnostic but not [[docetism|Docetic]],<ref name="Cees Christ"/> since "they do not believe the Christ departed from Jesus prior to the crucfixion".<ref name="Winker 1994 p."/> "Steiner's Christology is discussed as a central element of his thought in Johannes Hemleben, ''Rudolf Steiner: A Documentary Biography,'' trans. Leo Twyman (East Grinstead, Sussex: Henry Goulden, 1975), pp. 96-100. From the perspective of orthodox Christianity, it may be said that Steiner combined a docetic understanding of Christ's nature with the Adoptionist heresy."<ref name="g483">{{cite book | last=Etter | first=Brian K. | title=From Classicism to Modernism | publisher=Routledge | year=2019 | orig-year=2001 | isbn=978-1-315-18576-7 | chapter=Chapter Six The New Music and the Influence of Theosophy | page=unpaginated. fn. 80.}}</ref> |
| ===Statements on race=== | ===Statements on race=== |
Okumaya devam et...