Joe Dispenza: replies
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 11:33, 6 May 2024 |
| Line 37: | Line 37: |
*The article deleted in 2020 was actually significantly poorer than the one deleted in 2010. The 2020 article had two references ([https://drjoedispenza.com/pages/about/ 1] [https://www.gaia.com/person/joe-dispenza 2]), neither of which were much good, and a link to his Youtube channel. I've temporarily undeleted for review of all, but for me this is '''endorse deletion''' as G4 is accurate considering it is actually a reduced version of the 2010 deleted article. [[User aniel|Daniel]] ([[User talkaniel|talk]]) 09:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | *The article deleted in 2020 was actually significantly poorer than the one deleted in 2010. The 2020 article had two references ([https://drjoedispenza.com/pages/about/ 1] [https://www.gaia.com/person/joe-dispenza 2]), neither of which were much good, and a link to his Youtube channel. I've temporarily undeleted for review of all, but for me this is '''endorse deletion''' as G4 is accurate considering it is actually a reduced version of the 2010 deleted article. [[Useraniel|Daniel]] ([[User talkaniel|talk]]) 09:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |
| *'''Endorse''' G4 per the {{diff2|1221535731|McClenon Criterion}}. You shouldn't be able to evade a G4 by merely removing content from the version deleted at AfD. Of course, any editor is welcome to create a new, properly-sourced article for the subject. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 11:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | *'''Endorse''' G4 per the {{diff2|1221535731|McClenon Criterion}}. You shouldn't be able to evade a G4 by merely removing content from the version deleted at AfD. Of course, any editor is welcome to create a new, properly-sourced article for the subject. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 11:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |
| **"You shouldn't be able to evade a G4 by merely removing content from the version deleted at AfD." Fair enough, but I don't see how that should apply here, to a different stub created by a different person, ten years later. --[[Useraul_012|Paul_012]] ([[User talkaul_012|talk]]) 11:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC) | |
| *'''Endorse''' the G4 for either of two reasons. First, I have identical copies of a lot of things that are more than ten years old on my C: drive and my F: drive. That's what they're for. The idea that someone wouldn't have held onto a substantially identical copy is silly. Second, a substantially worse version of a deleted article should be deleted. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 15:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | *'''Endorse''' the G4 for either of two reasons. First, I have identical copies of a lot of things that are more than ten years old on my C: drive and my F: drive. That's what they're for. The idea that someone wouldn't have held onto a substantially identical copy is silly. Second, a substantially worse version of a deleted article should be deleted. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 15:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |
| **The first point is irrelevant, as it's a totally different person creating a totally unrelated version; I should have phrased it differently. And while I see where you're coming from, I still do not believe it to be within the spirit of G4 to overextend the criterion to newly created, entirely different stubs. Identifying such version as "substantially worse" will always be a judgment call, and CSD is for undisputable cases. And G4 should hardly remain appropriate after ''ten years'', as it's most likely that {{tq|the reason for the deletion no longer applies}}, which in this case, is the lack of third-party coverage, which now [[WP:NEXIST]].[https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-j...heelchair-joe-dispenza-pseudoscience-1347580/] --[[Useraul_012|Paul_012]] ([[User talkaul_012|talk]]) 11:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC) | |
| ====[[:Sri Yala Batik]]==== | ====[[:Sri Yala Batik]]==== |
Okumaya devam et...