Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

[XFB] Konu Bilgileri

Konu Hakkında Merhaba, tarihinde Wiki kategorisinde News tarafından oluşturulan Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard başlıklı konuyu okuyorsunuz. Bu konu şimdiye dek 4 kez görüntülenmiş, 0 yorum ve 0 tepki puanı almıştır...
Kategori Adı Wiki
Konu Başlığı Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard
Konbuyu başlatan News
Başlangıç tarihi
Cevaplar
Görüntüleme
İlk mesaj tepki puanı
Son Mesaj Yazan News

News

Moderator
Top Poster Of Month
Credits
0
Reopening the status of VOA as a perennial source: clarify

← Previous revision
Revision as of 06:58, 3 May 2024
Line 1,612:Line 1,612:
:How systematic are we talking, do you think? Surely even a semi-frequent pattern of errors concerning a particular topic isn't good enough unless we have some external validation of false reporting going on at the outlet. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 05:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC):How systematic are we talking, do you think? Surely even a semi-frequent pattern of errors concerning a particular topic isn't good enough unless we have some external validation of false reporting going on at the outlet. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 05:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
::Same as anything else, uncorrected errors are useful as is expert comment.[[User:Boynamedsue|Boynamedsue]] ([[User talk:Boynamedsue|talk]]) 06:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)::Same as anything else, uncorrected errors are useful as is expert comment.[[User:Boynamedsue|Boynamedsue]] ([[User talk:Boynamedsue|talk]]) 06:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
:I think VOA is reliable. I perused through some of their mainpage articles about controversial topics (such as [https://www.voanews.com/a/russia-un...re-contempt-of-court-accusations/7595178.html]) and they seem fine. It is certainly not state media in the way [[Xinhua]] and [[Russia Today]] are. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 06:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC):I think VOA is reliable. I perused through some of their mainpage articles about controversial topics (such as [https://www.voanews.com/a/russia-un...re-contempt-of-court-accusations/7595178.html]) and they seem fine. It is certainly not the way [[Xinhua]] and [[Russia Today]] are. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 06:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Okumaya devam et...
 

Geri
Üst