Wikipedia:No queerphobes: speedy endorse
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 03:24, 9 May 2024 |
| Line 27: | Line 27: |
*'''Endorse''' the closure as keep (involved editor of the essay prior to the MfD) - In fact on the grounds of [[WP RVPURPOSE]] 5. {{tq|to repeat arguments already made in the deletion discussion}} & 8. {{tq|to attack other editors, cast aspersions, or '''make accusations of bias (such requests may be speedily closed)'''}}, this may qualify for a speedy close. The nominator already made the same argument raised here during the MfD that somehow notifying WP:LGBT on an essay about a LGBT topic is somehow biased or violated the very definition and first line of [[WP:APPNOTE]]. If this were true, then any notification of any Wikiproject on a topic that it concerns itself with in the future would be void as well. This would imply ''No more notifying WP:TRAINS if an article related to trains is nominated for discussions.'' The DRV makes no new arguments, other than repeating that somehow WP:LGBT is supposedly different, which cannot be read as anything other than an accusation of bias. As is the very topic of the essay at hand, we luckily do not have a Wikiproject that openly promotes hate speech and should not and it is a fallacy to somehow argue that because we don't have a Wikiproject supporting hate speech that notifying the Wikiproject that does concern itself with the topic at hand is therefore not appropriate. Anyone is free to follow a Wikiproject and do so for a variety of reasons. So, beyond the current topic at hand, if the nominator want to suggest a change in policy of APPNOTE itself, then this is not the correct venue for it. [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 01:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC) | *'''Endorse''' the closure as keep (involved editor of the essay prior to the MfD) - In fact on the grounds of [[WPRVPURPOSE]] 5. {{tq|to repeat arguments already made in the deletion discussion}} & 8. {{tq|to attack other editors, cast aspersions, or '''make accusations of bias (such requests may be speedily closed)'''}}, this may qualify for a speedy close. The nominator already made the same argument raised here during the MfD that somehow notifying WP:LGBT on an essay about a LGBT topic is somehow biased or violated the very definition and first line of [[WP:APPNOTE]]. If this were true, then any notification of any Wikiproject on a topic that it concerns itself with in the future would be void as well. This would imply ''No more notifying WP:TRAINS if an article related to trains is nominated for discussions.'' The DRV makes no new arguments, other than repeating that somehow WP:LGBT is supposedly different, which cannot be read as anything other than an accusation of bias. As is the very topic of the essay at hand, we luckily do not have a Wikiproject that openly promotes hate speech and should not and it is a fallacy to somehow argue that because we don't have a Wikiproject supporting hate speech that notifying the Wikiproject that does concern itself with the topic at hand is therefore not appropriate. Anyone is free to follow a Wikiproject and do so for a variety of reasons. So, beyond the current topic at hand, if the nominator want to suggest a change in policy of APPNOTE itself, then this is not the correct venue for it. [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 01:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
| *'''Speedy endorse''', no case has been made for why this needs to be revisited as the non-issue of canvassing was already addressed in the MfD while it ran. DRV isn't the 3rd bite at the apple. I appreciate that AO doesn't care for the "No X" essays, but the method for that is getting the policy changed, not MfD and DRV for one that has been deemed to not be an issue. [[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#be33ff;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#ff33da;">Mississippi</span>]] 02:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC) | *'''Speedy endorse''', no case has been made for why this needs to be revisited as the non-issue of canvassing was already addressed in the MfD while it ran. DRV isn't the 3rd bite at the apple. I appreciate that AO doesn't care for the "No X" essays, but the method for that is getting the policy changed, not MfD and DRV for one that has been deemed to not be an issue. [[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#be33ff;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#ff33da;">Mississippi</span>]] 02:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Speedy endorse''' per Radalic ([[WPRVPURPOSE]]) and per the various correct interpretations of [[WP:APPNOTE]] and [[WP:WikiProject]] made during the MfD. –[[User:RoxySaunders|RoxySaunders  ]] ([[User talk:RoxySaunders| ]] • [[Special:Contributions/RoxySaunders| ]]) 03:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
Okumaya devam et...