Khymani James: Reply
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 05:17, 1 May 2024 |
| Line 43: | Line 43: |
| *I’d say delete. It does not seem he has much individual note. A newsworthy (but not long term-significant) instance of bigoted remarks and involvement in a movement that is itself notable does not strike me as enough. [[User:SecretName101|SecretName101]] ([[User talk:SecretName101|talk]]) 02:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC) | *I’d say delete. It does not seem he has much individual note. A newsworthy (but not long term-significant) instance of bigoted remarks and involvement in a movement that is itself notable does not strike me as enough. [[User:SecretName101|SecretName101]] ([[User talk:SecretName101|talk]]) 02:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
| *'''Delete''' - single notable event to his name with limited media coverage. unless more comes out related him that generates extensive coverage, no reason he can't just be covered under the protest page [[User:Claire 26|Claire 26]] ([[User talk:Claire 26|talk]]) 04:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - single notable event to his name with limited media coverage. unless more comes out related him that generates extensive coverage, no reason he can't just be covered under the protest page [[User:Claire 26|Claire 26]] ([[User talk:Claire 26|talk]]) 04:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
| :'''Delete''' Article is currently written like a hitpiece and violates BLP. The student isn't notable at the moment. [[User:HadesTTW|HadesTTW]] (he/him • [[User talk:HadesTTW|talk]]) 05:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
Okumaya devam et...