User talk:Dyanega

[XFB] Konu Bilgileri

Konu Hakkında Merhaba, tarihinde Wiki kategorisinde News tarafından oluşturulan User talk:Dyanega başlıklı konuyu okuyorsunuz. Bu konu şimdiye dek 1 kez görüntülenmiş, 0 yorum ve 0 tepki puanı almıştır...
Kategori Adı Wiki
Konu Başlığı User talk:Dyanega
Konbuyu başlatan News
Başlangıç tarihi
Cevaplar
Görüntüleme
İlk mesaj tepki puanı
Son Mesaj Yazan News

News

Moderator
Top Poster Of Month
Credits
0
I would like some info related to scaralis species and some other neotropical fulgoridae: Reply

← Previous revision
Revision as of 06:46, 27 April 2024
Line 262:Line 262:
::::I meant not in iNat observations. [[User:Uploader1234567890|Uploader1234567890]] ([[User talk:Uploader1234567890|talk]]) 16:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)::::I meant not in iNat observations. [[User:Uploader1234567890|Uploader1234567890]] ([[User talk:Uploader1234567890|talk]]) 16:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
The problems with ''Scaralis fluvialis'' and ''Auchalea annulata'' are the same: Lallemand's descriptions have no accompanying illustrations, and his type specimens are not easily accessible. Case in point: his description of ''Auchalea annulata'' mentions no feature that would allow it to be distinguished from ''Auchalea pandora''. Until someone compares the two respective type specimens, it is impossible to know for sure whether ''Auchalea annulata'' is a valid species or not. I would bet money that it is not. Also, I found the original description of ''Amantia magnifica'', and it specifically states the basal half of the hindwings is golden yellow, and that the head and thorax are green with red marks. The images in iNaturalist are very clearly misidentified, and are ''Auchalea''. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega#top|talk]]) 18:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)The problems with ''Scaralis fluvialis'' and ''Auchalea annulata'' are the same: Lallemand's descriptions have no accompanying illustrations, and his type specimens are not easily accessible. Case in point: his description of ''Auchalea annulata'' mentions no feature that would allow it to be distinguished from ''Auchalea pandora''. Until someone compares the two respective type specimens, it is impossible to know for sure whether ''Auchalea annulata'' is a valid species or not. I would bet money that it is not. Also, I found the original description of ''Amantia magnifica'', and it specifically states the basal half of the hindwings is golden yellow, and that the head and thorax are green with red marks. The images in iNaturalist are very clearly misidentified, and are ''Auchalea''. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega#top|talk]]) 18:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
:Yes, I had also read about the green head and thorax, remember? You had access to the type of Quadricolor and fluvialis, as in your paper. Please explain… [[User:Uploader1234567890|Uploader1234567890]] ([[User talk:Uploader1234567890|talk]]) 06:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Okumaya devam et...
 

Geri
Üst