BuddyBoy600: Improving the article.
In September 1997, U.S. District Senior Judge [[Edward Rafeedie]] ordered Disney to pay Marsu B.V. nearly $10.4 million in damages for breaching its promise to make 13 half-hour episodes. The lawsuit stated that Disney failed the character of Marsupilami proper marketing, in favor of the company's more popular franchises such as ''[[Aladdin (1992 Disney film)|Aladdin]]'' or ''[[The Little Mermaid (1989 film)|The Little Mermaid]]''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=O’neill |first=Ann W. |date=1997-09-28 |title=Mickey's Masters Killed Fellow Cartoon Critter, Judge Rules |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-sep-28-me-37167-story.html |access-date=2023-11-15 |website=Los Angeles Times |language=en-US}}</ref>
By March 1999, Disney still owed $9.3 million to Marsu B.V.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Newswires |first=Dow Jones |date=1999-03-27 |title=Disney Still Owes $9.3 Million Award For Failing to Make Marsupilami a Star |language=en-US |work=Wall Street Journal |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB92245692447402051 |access-date=2023-11-15 |issn=0099-9660}}</ref> Although both [[Raw Toonage]], and [[Marsupilami (1993 TV Series)|Marsupilami]] were still reran on [[Toon Disney]] after that.
[[Category:1999 in United States case law]]
[[Category:1999 in United States]]
[[Category
isney]]
[[Category:Marsupilami]]
Okumaya devam et...
In September 1997, U.S. District Senior Judge [[Edward Rafeedie]] ordered Disney to pay Marsu B.V. nearly $10.4 million in damages for breaching its promise to make 13 half-hour episodes. The lawsuit stated that Disney failed the character of Marsupilami proper marketing, in favor of the company's more popular franchises such as ''[[Aladdin (1992 Disney film)|Aladdin]]'' or ''[[The Little Mermaid (1989 film)|The Little Mermaid]]''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=O’neill |first=Ann W. |date=1997-09-28 |title=Mickey's Masters Killed Fellow Cartoon Critter, Judge Rules |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-sep-28-me-37167-story.html |access-date=2023-11-15 |website=Los Angeles Times |language=en-US}}</ref>
By March 1999, Disney still owed $9.3 million to Marsu B.V.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Newswires |first=Dow Jones |date=1999-03-27 |title=Disney Still Owes $9.3 Million Award For Failing to Make Marsupilami a Star |language=en-US |work=Wall Street Journal |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB92245692447402051 |access-date=2023-11-15 |issn=0099-9660}}</ref> Although both [[Raw Toonage]], and [[Marsupilami (1993 TV Series)|Marsupilami]] were still reran on [[Toon Disney]] after that.
[[Category:1999 in United States case law]]
[[Category:1999 in United States]]
[[Category
isney]][[Category:Marsupilami]]
Okumaya devam et...