United Kingdom: Reword
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 07:14, 2 May 2024 |
| Line 274: | Line 274: |
| === United Kingdom === | === United Kingdom === |
| The British government and press generally expressed negative views on the protest, and aligned themselves with Japanese narratives.{{Efn|A Yonhap reporter argued that the sentiment in Australia, then a part of the [[British Empire]], did not match that of the U.K., and was mostly in line with that of other countries.<ref name=":20" />}} The U.K. and Japan were then in the [[Anglo-Japanese Alliance]]; the U.K. had previously advocated for Korea's annexation by Japan, and blocked Korea's attempts to protest the annexation at the [[Hague Convention of 1907]].<ref name=":20">{{Cite web |last=박 |first=대한 |date=2019-02-20 |title=[외신속 3·1 운동] ⑨ '영일동맹' 허울에 英언론 日 '받아쓰기' 그쳐 |url=https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190212161500085 |access-date=2024-05-01 |website=[[Yonhap News Agency]] |language=ko}}</ref> | The government and press of the United Kingdom generally expressed negative views on the protest, and aligned themselves with Japanese narratives.{{Efn|A Yonhap reporter argued that the sentiment in Australia, then a part of the [[British Empire]], did not match that of the U.K., and was mostly in line with that of other countries.<ref name=":20" />}} The U.K. and Japan were then in the [[Anglo-Japanese Alliance]]; the U.K. had previously advocated for Korea's annexation by Japan, and blocked Korea's attempts to protest the annexation at the [[Hague Convention of 1907]].<ref name=":20">{{Cite web |last=박 |first=대한 |date=2019-02-20 |title=[외신속 3·1 운동] ⑨ '영일동맹' 허울에 英언론 日 '받아쓰기' 그쳐 |url=https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190212161500085 |access-date=2024-05-01 |website=[[Yonhap News Agency]] |language=ko}}</ref> |
| British newspapers such as ''[[The Times]]'' and ''[[The Guardian]]'', based on information from ''[[Reuters]]'',{{Efn|These ''Reuters'' reports also initially influenced coverage in France. A number of French articles cited the reports while describing the protests as violent riots.<ref name="Yonhap 10" />}} described the movement as "riots" and the protestors as violent mobs that indiscriminately attacked authorities and burned down buildings. One article on the movement, titled "[[Bolshevism]] in Korea", claimed that leftist Koreans in Shanghai were attempting to cause a violent revolution in Korea.<ref name=":20" /> A Yonhap reporter argues that, amidst growing international criticism of Japan, ''The Guardian'' reversed course on its coverage of Korea. On April 23, ''The Guardian'' published an article titled "Korea", in which it acknowledged that colonial policies had been repressive, and that Japan had been attempting to replace Korean culture. It argued that Japan would not achieve peace through further violent suppression of the protests.<ref name=":20" /> | British newspapers such as ''[[The Times]]'' and ''[[The Guardian]]'', based on information from ''[[Reuters]]'',{{Efn|These ''Reuters'' reports also initially influenced coverage in France. A number of French articles cited the reports while describing the protests as violent riots.<ref name="Yonhap 10" />}} described the movement as "riots" and the protestors as violent mobs that indiscriminately attacked authorities and burned down buildings. One article on the movement, titled "[[Bolshevism]] in Korea", claimed that leftist Koreans in Shanghai were attempting to cause a violent revolution in Korea.<ref name=":20" /> A Yonhap reporter argues that, amidst growing international criticism of Japan, ''The Guardian'' reversed course on its coverage of Korea. On April 23, ''The Guardian'' published an article titled "Korea", in which it acknowledged that colonial policies had been repressive, and that Japan had been attempting to replace Korean culture. It argued that Japan would not achieve peace through further violent suppression of the protests.<ref name=":20" /> |
Okumaya devam et...