ref
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 11:36, 7 May 2024 |
| Line 63: | Line 63: |
| In late 2019 Maugham referred to the [[Talkradio]] presenter [[Julia Hartley-Brewer]] having [[Doxing|revealed his home address]] at a time when he was receiving [[death threat]]s.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> Maugham criticised the television programme [[Question Time (TV programme)|''Question Time'']] for allowing Hartley-Brewer to appear as a panellist. There was considerable criticism of the decision on social networks and a campaign to boycott Question Time in view of its decision to feature Hartley-Brewer following her actions.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> Hartley-Brewer said Maugham's address was already easily available online and that he had previously revealed it himself in published interviews.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott>{{cite news|last=Bond|first=Kimberley|date=10 October 2019|title=Julia Hartley-Brewer to feature on Question Time despite boycott|url=https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/...n-question-time-despite-boycott/|work=[[Radio Times]]|accessdate=29 December 2019}}</ref> | In late 2019 Maugham referred to the [[Talkradio]] presenter [[Julia Hartley-Brewer]] having [[Doxing|revealed his home address]] at a time when he was receiving [[death threat]]s.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> Maugham criticised the television programme [[Question Time (TV programme)|''Question Time'']] for allowing Hartley-Brewer to appear as a panellist. There was considerable criticism of the decision on social networks and a campaign to boycott Question Time in view of its decision to feature Hartley-Brewer following her actions.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> Hartley-Brewer said Maugham's address was already easily available online and that he had previously revealed it himself in published interviews.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott>{{cite news|last=Bond|first=Kimberley|date=10 October 2019|title=Julia Hartley-Brewer to feature on Question Time despite boycott|url=https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/...n-question-time-despite-boycott/|work=[[Radio Times]]|accessdate=29 December 2019}}</ref> |
| On 26 December 2019 ([[Boxing Day]]), Maugham stated in a [[Twitter]] post that he had "killed a fox with a baseball bat".<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite news |last=Booth |first=William |date=30 December 2019 |title=A British barrister was famous for battling Brexit. Then he beat a fox to death, while wearing a kimono. |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c50612-2aed-11ea-bffe-020c88b3f120_story.html}}</ref> Maugham said that the fox was entrapped by the netting surrounding a hen house in his garden. The killing drew widespread condemnation and received extensive coverage, domestically and internationally.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /> The [[Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals]] investigated the matter,<ref name=":0">{{cite news|last=Gayle|first=Damien|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer Jolyon Maugham clubs fox to death while wearing kimono|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...eets-about-clubbing-a-fox-to-death|work=[[The Guardian]]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite news|last=Dearden|first=Lizzie|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer sparks backlash with tweet about 'killing fox with baseball bat'|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20...ox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-date=14 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=[[The Independent]]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref> but decided not to prosecute because a post-mortem showed the fox had been killed swiftly, meaning that "the evidential threshold needed to take a prosecution under the [[Crown Prosecution Service|CPS]] code was not met".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51755899 |title=Fox-killing lawyer Jolyon Maugham will not be charged, says RSPCA |date=5 March 2020 |accessdate=22 May 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref> In 2021, Maugham said that he and his chambers were blacklisted by law firm [[Allen & Overy]] as a result of the incident.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Connelly |first=Thomas |date=15 February 2021 |title=Jo Maugham QC claims Allen & Overy blacklisted him and his chambers |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2021/02/jo-maugham-qc-claims-ao-blacklisted-him-and-his-chambers/}}</ref> | On 26 December 2019 ([[Boxing Day]]), Maugham stated in a [[Twitter]] post that he had "killed a fox with a baseball bat".<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite news |last=Booth |first=William |date=30 December 2019 |title=A British barrister was famous for battling Brexit. Then he beat a fox to death, while wearing a kimono. |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c50612-2aed-11ea-bffe-020c88b3f120_story.html}}</ref> Maugham said that the fox was entrapped by the netting surrounding a hen house in his garden. The killing drew widespread condemnation and received extensive coverage, domestically and internationally.{{refn|name=foxpress|<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />}} The [[Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals]] investigated the matter,<ref name=":0">{{cite news|last=Gayle|first=Damien|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer Jolyon Maugham clubs fox to death while wearing kimono|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...eets-about-clubbing-a-fox-to-death|work=[[The Guardian]]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite news|last=Dearden|first=Lizzie|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer sparks backlash with tweet about 'killing fox with baseball bat'|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20...ox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-date=14 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=[[The Independent]]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref> but decided not to prosecute because a post-mortem showed the fox had been killed swiftly, meaning that "the evidential threshold needed to take a prosecution under the [[Crown Prosecution Service|CPS]] code was not met".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51755899 |title=Fox-killing lawyer Jolyon Maugham will not be charged, says RSPCA |date=5 March 2020 |accessdate=22 May 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref> In 2021, Maugham said that he and his chambers were blacklisted by law firm [[Allen & Overy]] as a result of the incident.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Connelly |first=Thomas |date=15 February 2021 |title=Jo Maugham QC claims Allen & Overy blacklisted him and his chambers |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2021/02/jo-maugham-qc-claims-ao-blacklisted-him-and-his-chambers/}}</ref> |
| ==References== | ==References== |
Okumaya devam et...